Search our website Back to Home Page   >About the DHB   >Overview   >Our Localities   >Demography

CMDHB Home Page
About the DHB
Our Localities

 

About Counties Manukau District Health Board

Our Localities

Demography

1.3 < Social characteristics
1.4 New Zealand Deprivation Index (NZDep06)

Figure 1.9 CMDHB 2006 population by NZDep06 (by meshblock), by area


NZDep06 is a census based small area index of deprivation, with a relative deprivation score assigned to each meshblock in New Zealand. It combines nine variables from the 2006 census reflecting eight dimensions of deprivation.  Meshblocks are geographical units defined by Statistics New Zealand, containing a median of approximately 87 people in 2006.  The variables that make up NZDep06 are listed in order of importance in the table below.

Table 1.17  NZDep06 variables

Dimension of deprivation

 

Variable description (in order of decreasing weight)

Income

People aged 18-64 receiving a means tested benefit

Income

People living in equivalised* households with income below an income threshold

Owned home

Support

Employment

People not living in own home

People aged <65 living in a single parent family

People aged 18-64 unemployed

Qualifications

People aged 18-64 without any qualifications

Living space

People living in equivalised* households below a bedroom occupancy threshold

Communication

People with no access to a telephone

Transport

People with no access to a car

*Equivalisation: methods used to control for household composition.

The deprivation index applies to areas, not individual people, and is therefore useful in illustrating the neighbourhood effect, as well as combining variables affecting socio-economic status. The area index is also used as a proxy for individual socio-economic status when individual level data for income, education and occupation are not available. However, caution must be exercised as heterogeneity within meshblocks, and certainly within census area units, means that any socio-economic gradient present will be under-estimated.  Not everyone living in a poor area will be poor themselves, and living in a wealthy area does not automatically mean a person is wealthy.

The NZ Deprivation index is often analysed by decile, where decile 1 represents the 10% of meshblocks least deprived in NZ and decile 10 the most deprived.  Figure 1.9 shows the NZDep06 deciles for each locality.  Three main patterns are evident

  1. Low deprivation:  Howick/Pakuranga and Botany/Clevedon have relatively wealthy populations with very low rates of deprivation
  2. High deprivation:  Mangere, Otara and Manurewa have very high rates of deprivation, particularly skewed to the most deprived.  Papatoetoe is also relatively deprived, but not quite to the same extent
  3. NZ average – Papakura and Franklin show a much more moderate pattern, with residents spread across the deprivation deciles.  Papakura has an excess in decile 10, while Franklin has an excess at the less deprived end of the scale.

Significant sorting of the population by socio-economic status appears to occur at the suburb level within Manukau City.

Table 1.18  CMDHB 2006 NZDep06 deciles 9 and 10 by area

 

Proportion of each population in each area living in NZDep06 deciles 9 & 10

 

Total

0-14

15-64

65+

Maori

Pacific

Asian

Other

Howick/ Pakuranga

1%

1%

1%

2%

3%

3%

1%

1%

Botany/ Clevedon

1%

0%

0%

1%

1%

1%

0%

1%

Mangere

70%

75%

69%

61%

70%

80%

55%

45%

Papatoetoe

36%

40%

35%

30%

41%

47%

33%

28%

Otara

74%

80%

71%

75%

80%

87%

36%

49%

Manurewa

56%

64%

54%

41%

70%

78%

42%

39%

Papakura

38%

47%

38%

24%

63%

69%

31%

28%

Franklin

12%

15%

11%

11%

34%

38%

12%

7%

CMDHB

34%

43%

33%

24%

57%

74%

21%

17%

Health inequalities are particularly evident at the higher ends of the deprivation scale.  A summary measure of an area’s deprivation is then the % of the population living in decile 9 and 10 deprivation meshblocks.  Overall 34% of CMDHB’s population live in NZDep06 decile 9 and 10 areas (Table 1.18).  Otara (74%) and Mangere (70%) have extraordinarily high rates of deprivation, and Manurewa has more than half its population living in decile 9/10 areas.  Children are more likely to live in high deprivation areas - 43% overall compared with 33% for adults and 24% for older people (aged 65+).  Nearly three-quarters of the Pacific and more than half the Maori population live in high deprivation areas, compared to 21% for Asian and 17% for other ethnic groups.

Looking at it from a different angle, of all people living in decile 9 and 10 areas in CMDHB, 29% live in Manurewa (Table 1.19).  The areas with the highest proportions follow next, Mangere at 26% and Otara 18%.  More of the high deprivation Maori population live in Manurewa (36%) and Papakura (19%) than Mangere (16%) or Otara (14%).  For Pacific high deprivation more than a third live in Mangere (36%), followed by Otara (27%) and Manurewa (23%).

Table 1.19 Population proportions in 2006 for CMDHB's NZDep06 deciles 9 and 10 by area

 

As proportion of CMDHB's NZDep06 deciles 9 & 10 population

 

Total

0-14

15-64

65+

Maori

Pacific

Asian

Other

Howick/ Pakuranga

1%

0%

0%

3%

0%

0%

1%

1%

Botany/ Clevedon

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

Mangere

26%

26%

25%

25%

16%

36%

21%

13%

Papatoetoe

10%

9%

11%

13%

7%

8%

28%

12%

Otara

18%

19%

18%

15%

14%

27%

11%

8%

Manurewa

29%

30%

29%

25%

36%

23%

30%

34%

Papakura

12%

11%

12%

12%

19%

4%

7%

22%

Franklin

5%

4%

5%

7%

7%

1%

2%

9%

CMDHB

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

 

1.5 Future population growth >

 

 

Back to Top

 

 

Published:  29-Sep-2008  |   Website queries:  Web Content Manager